Same workload comparison
The same token mix is applied to each plan’s prices and model allowance. Check shared pools and time windows on the plan page.
Comparison example: 12,000 tokens/request · 83% cache read
Loading…
Anonymous user reports. They never change CP value; after 10 votes they count toward Today’s Pick. Press again to undo.
Example workload (12,000 tokens/request)
02Prices and allowances
Expand the ledger to verify four token prices, cost per request, model allowance and theoretical requests for this workload.
| Metric | Command Code GOAT Qwen 3.7 Flash |
|---|---|
| Input / 1M | $0.0300 |
| Cache read / 1M | $0.006000 |
| Output / 1M | $0.13 |
| Cache write / 1M | $0.0380 |
| Cost / request Recalculated | $0.00022012,000 tokens/request |
| Model allowance Published | $20Based on this model’s plan allowance |
| Requests / month Recalculated | 90,909Estimated with the 12,000-token workload above |
| 5-hour limit Published | $14Plan window |
| Weekly limit Published | $35Plan window |
| Monthly limit Published | $70Plan window |
03Official reference rows
Compare each provider’s reference token mix and published estimates below.
| Reference input / request | 800 |
|---|---|
| Reference cache read / request | 50,000 |
| Reference output / request | 200 |
| Reference cache write / request | 0 |
| Reference volume / request | 51,000 |
| Cost per request | $0.000350 |
| Model monthly allowance | $20 |
| Capacity basis | Estimated from plan prices and the reference workload |
Cost per request = add the four token classes after multiplying each by its price per 1,000,000 tokens.
floor($20 ÷ $0.000350) = 57,142
Official source: Command Code GOAT · Snapshot captured: 2026-10-23
05Usage and billing note
These model-level conditions change the estimate; the official plan document remains the source for plan rules.
Command Code GOAT: Earlier model; the page does not list a request estimate for this model.