Same workload comparison
The same token mix is applied to each plan’s prices and model allowance. Check shared pools and time windows on the plan page.
Comparison example: 12,000 tokens/request · 83% cache read
Loading…
Anonymous user reports. They never change CP value; after 10 votes they count toward Today’s Pick. Press again to undo.
Example workload (12,000 tokens/request)
02Prices and allowances
Expand the ledger to verify four token prices, cost per request, model allowance and theoretical requests for this workload.
| Metric | OpenCode Zen Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|
| Input / 1M | $0.30 |
| Cache read / 1M | $0.0300 |
| Output / 1M | $2.50 |
| Cache write / 1M | $0.000000 |
| Cost / request Recalculated | $0.00310012,000 tokens/request |
| Model allowance Published | Pay as you goNo plan allowance; billed per request |
| Requests / month Recalculated | Pay as you goNo plan allowance; compare its rates instead |
| 5-hour limit Published | —Pay as you go |
| Weekly limit Published | —Pay as you go |
| Monthly limit Published | —Pay as you go |
03Official reference rows
Compare each provider’s reference token mix and published estimates below.
| Reference input / request | 1,000 |
|---|---|
| Reference cache read / request | 10,000 |
| Reference output / request | 1,000 |
| Reference cache write / request | 0 |
| Reference volume / request | 12,000 |
| Cost per request | $0.003100 |
| Model monthly allowance | Pay as you go |
| Capacity basis | No published reference profile; the site common workload is used instead |
Official source: OpenCode Zen · Snapshot captured: 2026-10-23
04Artificial Analysis external scores
Benchmarks are from Artificial Analysis. See the source version and matched model below.
Scores describe the model’s performance on the named benchmarks. Results on your own tasks also depend on tools, prompts and execution environment.